AS/RS Handling Robot
Vertical Storage Module
Conveying Equipment
Smart Warehousing System
Warehouse Racking
Industries
Services
About Us
When Is an AS/RS Worth the Investment? Feasibility and Cost Analysis
Introduction
As factories expand, many manufacturers consider Automated Storage And Retrieval Systems to improve storage efficiency and reduce land use. Before deciding whether to build an AS/RS, it is important to understand its real value and conduct a feasibility analysis to confirm whether the project is both necessary and practical.
This article analyzes an automated warehouse project from five perspectives: AS/RS value, standardization work, technical requirements, business requirements, and cost.
Value of an AS/RS
Reducing forklift use is one of the direct benefits of an AS/RS. After the system is introduced, inbound and outbound operations are mainly completed by Stacker Cranes and conveyors. Goods can be transferred automatically to designated areas, reducing dependence on forklifts. This lowers forklift maintenance cost, labor cost, traffic congestion, and accident risk.
An AS/RS also reduces floor space. By using vertical storage, it makes full use of warehouse height. Compared with a conventional flat warehouse, it can provide much higher storage capacity within the same land area.
Inventory turnover and inbound/outbound efficiency can also be improved. Through Stacker Cranes and conveyor systems, goods can be stored and retrieved quickly and accurately. The system can dispatch goods according to demand, reducing waiting time and handling time.
Labor savings are another important value. An AS/RS has a high level of automation and requires fewer personnel for monitoring and maintenance. This allows the factory to allocate human resources to more valuable work.
The system also supports refined management. With WMS and WCS, the factory can track goods, monitor inventory status, analyze warehouse operations, and optimize supply chain decisions.
Finally, an AS/RS reduces safety risks. Automated equipment reduces direct human involvement in heavy material handling. Safety doors, sensors, and control logic help detect and prevent potential risks.
Standardization Before AS/RS Implementation
Business processes, operating procedures, and documents should be standardized before implementation. In addition, software standardization is also necessary to ensure system stability, consistency, and maintainability.
Includes AS/RS design standards, storage standards, inbound and outbound operation standards, and inventory management standards. The system design should consider cargo type, size, capacity, and weight. Storage locations and storage methods should be defined clearly so goods can be located and retrieved quickly.
Includes construction process, inbound and outbound process, and daily operation process. Project stages, responsible persons, operating procedures, and job responsibilities should all be clear.
Includes design documents, operation manuals, records, and reports. Layout drawings, structural design, equipment selection, operating standards, safety precautions, inventory reports, and exception records all support future operation and maintenance.
Business Requirement Analysis
In the case example, the project requirements were clear. The site size was 72,000 x 32,000 x 13,500 mm. Goods were finished products packaged in boxes and bags. The warehouse handled 300 SKUs, with one SKU per pallet and no mixed pallets.
The goods size including pallet was 1.35 x 1.35 x 1.5 m, with a weight of 500 kg per pallet. The maximum storage demand was 3,700 storage locations. The safety stock cycle was 15 days. Operating time was 6 hours per day, with inbound and outbound flow of 80 pallets per hour.
Based on the design, the AS/RS solution provided 3,744 pallet positions with a 6-level rack design. This could meet the 15-day safety stock requirement.
Conventional Flat Warehouse Comparison
The maximum available floor area of the project was 72 m x 32 m, or 2,304 square meters. After deducting forklift aisles and receiving/shipping areas, a conventional flat warehouse could provide 1,600 pallet positions with a 4-level stacking design.
The inventory capacity was calculated as 800 tons divided by 120 tons per day, or 6.7 days.
By comparison, the AS/RS could support 15 days of inventory, while the flat warehouse could only support 6.7 days. This would create serious inventory pressure and could affect production stability.
If the same number of storage positions were achieved without an AS/RS, the warehouse would require 5,158 square meters. Therefore, the AS/RS could save 2,854 square meters of land while solving the shortage of storage capacity.
Technical Requirement Analysis
The AS/RS project uses WMS and WCS for management. WMS refers to the warehouse management system, while WCS refers to the warehouse control system.
By using WMS and WCS, the factory can reduce the number of personnel needed for picking, searching, and handling abnormal goods. To achieve an inbound and outbound flow of 80 pallets per hour, at least four workers can be saved compared with the flat warehouse model.
The system also supports centralized information management and unified dispatching. Personnel can view inventory, location status, and inbound/outbound flow more conveniently, making warehouse operations more transparent and easier to manage.
Cost Analysis & Comparison
Cost Analysis
The warehouse floor area was 2,304 square meters. The building cost of a conventional flat warehouse was calculated at RMB 1,000 per square meter, while the AS/RS warehouse building cost was calculated at RMB 2,750 per square meter.
To meet the same storage capacity without an AS/RS, the flat warehouse building cost was calculated at RMB 5.158 million. The AS/RS warehouse building cost was RMB 6.336 million. Compared with the AS/RS solution, the flat warehouse would require more land. Additional land cost was calculated at RMB 642,000.
For equipment, the flat warehouse required four 3-ton electric forklifts and about RMB 600,000 of racking, with total equipment cost of around RMB 1.2 million. The AS/RS required a preliminary investment of RMB 6.2 million, plus two 3-ton electric forklifts costing about RMB 300,000.
As a result, fixed investment was RMB 6.358 million for the flat warehouse and RMB 12.836 million for the AS/RS. In terms of fixed investment, the AS/RS required RMB 6.478 million more than the flat warehouse.
Operating Cost Comparison
For the flat warehouse, one forklift with one operator can handle about 20 pallets per hour. To complete inbound and outbound flows of 40 pallets per hour each, four forklifts and four workers are required.
For the AS/RS, one manual forklift is required for inbound operation and one for outbound operation. The AS/RS model therefore requires two forklifts and two forklift operators, supported by the conveyor system.
The calculation standards used were RMB 100,000 per person per year for labor, RMB 0.4 per kWh for electricity, 2.5% of equipment investment for maintenance, and RMB 150,000 per forklift.
The total annual operating cost of the flat warehouse was about RMB 445,840. The total annual operating cost of the AS/RS was about RMB 459,700. Under this calculation model, the AS/RS operating cost was about RMB 13,860 higher per year.
Fifteen-Year Comprehensive Cost
The annual depreciation of the flat warehouse was calculated at RMB 279,900, while the annual depreciation of the AS/RS was RMB 818,200.
Over a 15-year period, the total comprehensive cost was RMB 12.9255 million for the flat warehouse and RMB 19.3015 million for the AS/RS. Under this model, the AS/RS cost about RMB 6.376 million more than the flat warehouse.
However, this cost comparison changes if external warehouse rental is required. Assuming the warehouse rent is RMB 5 per pallet position per day and the warehouse is rented for 300 days per year, the annual rental cost for the capacity gap is RMB 3.216 million.
From this perspective, the AS/RS becomes much more attractive, because it avoids long-term external storage cost and supports stable production inventory.
Summary & Conclusion
Summary
From the safety stock perspective, the flat warehouse capacity of 6.7 days cannot meet normal production requirements. The AS/RS can support 15 days of inventory, solving the storage shortage problem and improving refined management and safety.
From the direct cost perspective, the AS/RS does not show an advantage in fixed investment or operating cost under the base calculation model. Over 15 years, it requires additional cost compared with the flat warehouse.
From the warehouse rental perspective, however, the AS/RS can provide significant value. If the enterprise must rent external storage space to meet safety stock needs, the long-term rental cost may make the AS/RS solution more economical and strategically necessary.
Conclusion
An AS/RS is not automatically the cheapest choice. Its value depends on storage capacity pressure, land constraints, safety stock requirements, labor availability, management needs, and external warehousing cost.
For projects where a flat warehouse can meet storage needs at low cost, an AS/RS may not have a direct cost advantage. But where capacity shortage affects production stability or external warehouse rental is required, the AS/RS can become a practical and valuable investment.
FAQ
No. An AS/RS may require higher fixed investment and higher depreciation. The business value depends on storage capacity, land constraints, safety stock, labor pressure, rental alternatives, and management requirements.
The AS/RS supported about 15 days of inventory, while the conventional flat warehouse supported only about 6.7 days under the same site and operating conditions.
It becomes more attractive when limited space, insufficient safety stock, external warehouse rental, high manual handling risk, and poor inventory visibility begin to affect production stability.
Evaluating whether AS/RS is right for your factory? Contact DELIECN for a feasibility review covering capacity, throughput, cost, and process requirements.